Now that everyone has weighted in on bullying - from People Magazine to the White House - I am still confused by the definition of bullying. Is it physical contact, verbal abuse, false third-party stories or all of the above? The physical connotation I get. High school freshman year flash-backs confirm that on. Belittling and 'talk-down' is clear as well. But when someone writes something nasty about another on FaceBook and the ego suffers a bit, is it bullying? It certainly is when the ego is crashed to the point of suicide as recently happened. But where does one draw the line? There will always be someone louder, bigger, and meaner around - irrespective of age and circumstance. Its called 'life' and the nature of humankind. Should we then try to legalize morality to protect perceptions if actions cannot be defined?
Then there was the midterm elections and a dramatic shift in the political balance that could have a huge influence on education in the future. The National Education Association spent $40 million dollars to campaign for candidates from the Democratic Party. But the chairmanship for the committee dealing with educational affairs will be replaced by a Republican due to the House majority. Suddenly the Race to the Top program is in jeopardy, the reauthorization of the 'No Child Left Behind' can change again, and decentralization of education is back on the burner. All I know is that a strong opposition is healthy in any democracy, irrespective the ruling party.
Did you hear about predictions that online learning will overtake traditional classrooms in the next decade? The Los Angeles Times reports that there is no substitute for in-person classroom teaching but that type of education will become the minority by 2020. Hopefully education leaders will not use it as an excuse to properly maintain real-life buildings!
In Scotland, primary schools are piloting philosophy to improve students' critical thinking and listening skills. Students are engaged in discussions on topics such as society, leadership, and which is better: being strong or being clever. Teachers report that "they have seen clear changes in their listening, in the way they express themselves and how they think". Seems like Plato and Aristotle had it right all this time. Who would have thought?
Michael Cordier
No comments:
Post a Comment