Kate Quarfordt is a mother, teacher, artist, and writer. But she is not a policy wonk who scrutinizes education proposals for legislation. That is until she was asked to appear at a briefing on Capitol Hill representing practitioners to discuss policy recommendations for the Well-rounded Education in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
The act itself sounds great after years of hearing about math, science, reading and writing being highlighted in the 'No Child Left Behind' education policy. The budget request for ESEA in 2011 does reflect an increase of 38.9 million in funding to support teaching and learning in arts, history, civics, foreign languages, geography, and economics. But it seems as if this increase is achieved by combining eight subject-specific grant programs into a single competitive grant program.
Kate realized that disciplines other than math and science will have to compete against each other, "with some of them undoubtedly getting the short end of the stick". She further recognized the fact that pitting subjects against each other will undermine or eliminate the spirit of collaboration among disciplines in schools aiming to provide a well-rounded education.
My problem in addition to those stated by Kate lies in the small increase to cover so many important disciplines. $38.9 million dollars in the overall education budget is a proverbial drop in a bucket and will not have any impact on our 100,000 public schools. Neither will it lead to a truly comprehensive, well-rounded education program. A small comparison would be to look at the fully fledged foreign language schools in India and Pakistan to prepare their youth for the global markets. Or China focusing on world history and economics for the next generation to be the new world power.
The argument for more funding for the so called 'core subjects' is a mute point by now. It is well funded and fully integrated. The challenge now is to position our students to be competitive against students from the rest of the world. Somehow that critical point is lost in translation.
Michael Cordier
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Nutrition Becomes a Strategic Issue
The House Committee on Education and Labor passed the "Improving Nutrition for America's Children Act". This will now go to the House floor for financing - probably from the "Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010" passed by the Senate Agriculture Committee funded at $4.5 billion over 10 years.
A major push for this legislation comes from the military. Finally it is being acknowledged that obesity impacts the strategic balance of the country. For years, the fight of obesity was waged on micro level but now it is being fought at macro level because the increase of obesity threatens the very safety of the country. The 15,000 military recruiters found that 1 in 4, or 27% of all young adults between 17 and 24 cannot enlist. They are too overweight. As a result, hundreds of otherwise excellent recruits are being turned away.
The statistics are well known: Childhood obesity rates have tripled in the past 30 years. According to the CDC, in 10 years the number of states reporting 40% or more young adults as overweight or obese jumped from one to thirty nine!
A group of 150 retired generals and admirals released a report called "To Fat to Fight" to raise public awareness about a national security implications of the childhood obesity. The consensus is that parent choices cannot be legislated but food provided in school can be regulated. The price tag of $4.5 billion over ten years is far less than the $75 billion spent each year on health care costs related to obesity.
Finally, obesity is every one's problem.
Michael Cordier
A major push for this legislation comes from the military. Finally it is being acknowledged that obesity impacts the strategic balance of the country. For years, the fight of obesity was waged on micro level but now it is being fought at macro level because the increase of obesity threatens the very safety of the country. The 15,000 military recruiters found that 1 in 4, or 27% of all young adults between 17 and 24 cannot enlist. They are too overweight. As a result, hundreds of otherwise excellent recruits are being turned away.
The statistics are well known: Childhood obesity rates have tripled in the past 30 years. According to the CDC, in 10 years the number of states reporting 40% or more young adults as overweight or obese jumped from one to thirty nine!
A group of 150 retired generals and admirals released a report called "To Fat to Fight" to raise public awareness about a national security implications of the childhood obesity. The consensus is that parent choices cannot be legislated but food provided in school can be regulated. The price tag of $4.5 billion over ten years is far less than the $75 billion spent each year on health care costs related to obesity.
Finally, obesity is every one's problem.
Michael Cordier
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Accountability
An interesting article from the Washington Post by Daniel Willingham caught the eye the other day. It had nothing to do with physical activity on which we normally focus but might have everything to do with leading healthy lifestyles.
The author questions the push of the Department of Education towards teacher accountability where teachers could loose their jobs if student performance does not improve. The Department in essence gives students a free pass for any accountability (if tests scores are discounted). The point is made that it is fair for a first grade teacher to reach out to students as they might not respond on their own. But if the same thing is said to a high school teacher the system failed to teach and prepare students to handle responsibility.
Dr. Willingham, who teaches at the University of Virginia, reflects that freshmen are unaccustomed to the idea that they are fully responsible for their actions in the academic arena. In contrast, most professors think of students as 100% responsible for their own learning while their job is to teach well. It is indeed the same attitude in the workplace or military. Why then the entitlement attitude of young adults to think that someone else will step up or that there is always a plan B?
In all the formulations of teacher accountability for student performance, student responsibility is not taken into account at all. Failure is blamed solidly on teachers. Certainly students are responsible to do their part and society should demand it.
The same principle applies to leading a healthy lifestyle. One can have all the knowledge, all the equipment, and all the support, but if you don't take the first step you can expect personal results. It remains the responsibility of the individual.
Michael Cordier
The author questions the push of the Department of Education towards teacher accountability where teachers could loose their jobs if student performance does not improve. The Department in essence gives students a free pass for any accountability (if tests scores are discounted). The point is made that it is fair for a first grade teacher to reach out to students as they might not respond on their own. But if the same thing is said to a high school teacher the system failed to teach and prepare students to handle responsibility.
Dr. Willingham, who teaches at the University of Virginia, reflects that freshmen are unaccustomed to the idea that they are fully responsible for their actions in the academic arena. In contrast, most professors think of students as 100% responsible for their own learning while their job is to teach well. It is indeed the same attitude in the workplace or military. Why then the entitlement attitude of young adults to think that someone else will step up or that there is always a plan B?
In all the formulations of teacher accountability for student performance, student responsibility is not taken into account at all. Failure is blamed solidly on teachers. Certainly students are responsible to do their part and society should demand it.
The same principle applies to leading a healthy lifestyle. One can have all the knowledge, all the equipment, and all the support, but if you don't take the first step you can expect personal results. It remains the responsibility of the individual.
Michael Cordier
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
The Heavy Weights Weigh In
Imagine the incredible brain trust or think tank you get when combining the resources of the Centers for Disease Control and the Department of Health and Human Services. This happened recently when a research paper was published that summarized all research related to the association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance.
In fact, the team reviewed 406 articles from nine databases against a set of indicators including cognitive skills and attitudes, academic behaviors, academic achievement, physical activity, physical education, recess, classroom-based physical activity, and extracurricular physical activity. In the end, 50 unique studies from 43 articles deemed appropriate to analyze and draw conclusions.
Interestingly, across all 50 studies there were a total of 251 associations between physical activity and academic performance! Of all the associations examined, 50.5% were positive (supporting the benefits of physical activity on academic performance), 48% were not significant (in behavior, attitude, or academic change), and only 1.5% were negative.
In essence, 14 studies found one or more positive associations between school-based physical education and indicators of academic performance while three found no significant associations. Eight studies found one or more positive associations between recces and indicators of cognitive skills, attitudes, and academic behavior. None of the studies found negative associations with recess. Eight out of nine studies found positive associations between classroom-based physical activity and cognitive skills, attitudes, and academic behavior. The focus was on 5 - 20 minute activity breaks in academic classes (excluding PE).
All 19 studies examining relationships between participation in extracurricular physical activities (interscholastic or other sports) and academic performance found one or more positive associations between such activities and academic performance.
The implication of this report for policy is far reaching. There is substantial evidence that physical activity improve academic performance including grades and standardized test scores. It underscores that physical activity have an impact on cognitive skills and attitudes as well as academic behavior - all of which are important components of improved academic performance. Finally, increasing or maintaining time dedicated to physical education may help, and does not appear to adversely impact, academic performance.
We rest our case.
Michael Cordier
In fact, the team reviewed 406 articles from nine databases against a set of indicators including cognitive skills and attitudes, academic behaviors, academic achievement, physical activity, physical education, recess, classroom-based physical activity, and extracurricular physical activity. In the end, 50 unique studies from 43 articles deemed appropriate to analyze and draw conclusions.
Interestingly, across all 50 studies there were a total of 251 associations between physical activity and academic performance! Of all the associations examined, 50.5% were positive (supporting the benefits of physical activity on academic performance), 48% were not significant (in behavior, attitude, or academic change), and only 1.5% were negative.
In essence, 14 studies found one or more positive associations between school-based physical education and indicators of academic performance while three found no significant associations. Eight studies found one or more positive associations between recces and indicators of cognitive skills, attitudes, and academic behavior. None of the studies found negative associations with recess. Eight out of nine studies found positive associations between classroom-based physical activity and cognitive skills, attitudes, and academic behavior. The focus was on 5 - 20 minute activity breaks in academic classes (excluding PE).
All 19 studies examining relationships between participation in extracurricular physical activities (interscholastic or other sports) and academic performance found one or more positive associations between such activities and academic performance.
The implication of this report for policy is far reaching. There is substantial evidence that physical activity improve academic performance including grades and standardized test scores. It underscores that physical activity have an impact on cognitive skills and attitudes as well as academic behavior - all of which are important components of improved academic performance. Finally, increasing or maintaining time dedicated to physical education may help, and does not appear to adversely impact, academic performance.
We rest our case.
Michael Cordier
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Ohio Gets It Right!
The legislation in Ohio just signed the Healthy Choices for Healthy Children into law and will take affect in the new school year. They are obviously serious about curbing obesity in this state where it is estimated that 19% of all kids are overweight. The legislation calls for:
Michael Cordier
- Healthy interventions from Kindergarten through 12th grades;
- Schools to use Body Mass Index (BMI) to estimate a healthy body weight (but parents can opt out);
- PE teachers hired after 2012 must be certified and licensed;
- All schools are required to offer a pilot program with 30 minutes of rigorous physical activity each day - aside from recess;
- Schools are forced to provide healthier options in cafeterias and vending machines.
Michael Cordier
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
The Crux of the Matter
Cleveland.com reported that lawmakers in the Ohio State House voted 77 - 21 to approve legislation which pushes out candy machines and soda pop in favor of low-fat milk, fruit juices, water, and healthier food in Ohio's school lunch rooms by 2014. The bill furthermore requires Ohio schools to measure student's body mass index in Kindergarten, third, fifth, and ninth grades and calls for 30 minutes of physical activity a day. So far, so good.
Then the infighting started. Republicans say that government is interfering too much and taking responsibility away from parents. They admit that one third of students in Ohio is obese. It is therefore a difficult argument to make because one third of parents are contributing to the obesity problem. The Democrats argues that they know physical activity and nutrition will improve the health of youth but there are possible exceptions. Immediately the door opens for both parties to 'pull the teeth' from good legislation for their own political purposes.
The end result is that school districts can seek a waiver to drop the body mass index measurement. Who is going to add more work on an overburdened system? It is fair to assume that this initiative has already failed. Furthermore, school districts successfully lobbied to turn the 30 minutes of daily exercise into a pilot project for districts who want to participate. Guess what's going to happen amongst scheduling nightmares? It's not going to happen.
So the winners are the politicians who tackled a 'tough subject' and passed some legislation and the school districts which can opt out in the primary areas of assessment and activity.
The biggest losers? The students - again!
Michael Cordier
Then the infighting started. Republicans say that government is interfering too much and taking responsibility away from parents. They admit that one third of students in Ohio is obese. It is therefore a difficult argument to make because one third of parents are contributing to the obesity problem. The Democrats argues that they know physical activity and nutrition will improve the health of youth but there are possible exceptions. Immediately the door opens for both parties to 'pull the teeth' from good legislation for their own political purposes.
The end result is that school districts can seek a waiver to drop the body mass index measurement. Who is going to add more work on an overburdened system? It is fair to assume that this initiative has already failed. Furthermore, school districts successfully lobbied to turn the 30 minutes of daily exercise into a pilot project for districts who want to participate. Guess what's going to happen amongst scheduling nightmares? It's not going to happen.
So the winners are the politicians who tackled a 'tough subject' and passed some legislation and the school districts which can opt out in the primary areas of assessment and activity.
The biggest losers? The students - again!
Michael Cordier
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
The Truth and Nothing But the Truth
Finally someone spoke up and reported it: the state mandates for physical education is a farce in most cases. It lacks the teeth to be effective due to the rising number of mindless waivers and exemptions that students and parents can use not to partake in physical education.
The Associate Press reported on a study by the American Heart Association and National Association (AHA) for Sports and Physical Education (NASPE) that shows more states requiring physical education at elementary, middle, and high schools but few require students to exercise for a specific amount of time. AHA's Nancy Brown comments that "the movement has not been more significant and it is more of a sporadic approach".
Waivers and exemptions include participation in band, ROITC, one semester of organized sport, dress-out restrictions, and the list goes on. The end result is that students are denied proper teaching of healthy lifestyles. It is well documented that physical education counters obesity and long-term health problems in addition to better academic performance.
84% of states require PE for elementary students, 76% for middle and junior high schools, and 90% in high schools. This is significantly higher than a few years a go. Interesting to note that only five states require PE consistently from K - 12.
Both the AHA and NASPE recommend 150 minutes a week of instructed physical education for elementary students and 225 minutes a week for middle and high school students. The issue remains to get students in the PE class!
Michael Cordier
The Associate Press reported on a study by the American Heart Association and National Association (AHA) for Sports and Physical Education (NASPE) that shows more states requiring physical education at elementary, middle, and high schools but few require students to exercise for a specific amount of time. AHA's Nancy Brown comments that "the movement has not been more significant and it is more of a sporadic approach".
Waivers and exemptions include participation in band, ROITC, one semester of organized sport, dress-out restrictions, and the list goes on. The end result is that students are denied proper teaching of healthy lifestyles. It is well documented that physical education counters obesity and long-term health problems in addition to better academic performance.
84% of states require PE for elementary students, 76% for middle and junior high schools, and 90% in high schools. This is significantly higher than a few years a go. Interesting to note that only five states require PE consistently from K - 12.
Both the AHA and NASPE recommend 150 minutes a week of instructed physical education for elementary students and 225 minutes a week for middle and high school students. The issue remains to get students in the PE class!
Michael Cordier
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Physical Education Legislation - A Positive Step
The 'Fitness Integrated with Teaching Act' or FIT Kids Act has been approved by the US House on April 21, 2010 and is heading to the Senate for approval. However, this legislation has met some opposition and the fear is that it could get bogged down due to the measure's new reporting requirements.
The legislation would impose a new set of reporting requirements on virtually all school districts to make it easier for members of the public to learn what physical activities and education schools offer. The argument is that these reporting requirements would burden local schools already struggling to meet a vast array of federal mandates.
Like so many initiatives, this bill does not provide federal aid for districts to spend on PE but does call for an unspecified amount of funding for the National Research Council to examine and make recommendations on 'innovative and effective ways to increase physical activity'. As if we need yet another study to confirm findings of hundreds of other studies over the past 10 years.
Boo-hoo to both groups for opposing accountability to finally make PE part of a level playing field (pardon the pun) and legislators for proposing a toothless initiative where the money is not where the mouth is. It sounds like a lot of 'feel-good' language to counter a growing concern about childhood obesity in the USA.
The upside is that physical education is on the front burner of legislators and critical issues are being addressed to imform parents and the public on:
- The amount of time students are required to spend in PE by grade level compared to national recommendations;
- Whether schools follow an age-appropriate PE curriculum;
- How schools promote 'healthy lifestyles' including school programs and policies on nutrition and physical activity as it relates to Title I recipients.
Data collection costs money and so does good programs. Perhaps research appropriation should go to data collection which will identify good practices and thus provide direction on proper spending or equipment and curriculum.
Michael Cordier
The legislation would impose a new set of reporting requirements on virtually all school districts to make it easier for members of the public to learn what physical activities and education schools offer. The argument is that these reporting requirements would burden local schools already struggling to meet a vast array of federal mandates.
Like so many initiatives, this bill does not provide federal aid for districts to spend on PE but does call for an unspecified amount of funding for the National Research Council to examine and make recommendations on 'innovative and effective ways to increase physical activity'. As if we need yet another study to confirm findings of hundreds of other studies over the past 10 years.
Boo-hoo to both groups for opposing accountability to finally make PE part of a level playing field (pardon the pun) and legislators for proposing a toothless initiative where the money is not where the mouth is. It sounds like a lot of 'feel-good' language to counter a growing concern about childhood obesity in the USA.
The upside is that physical education is on the front burner of legislators and critical issues are being addressed to imform parents and the public on:
- The amount of time students are required to spend in PE by grade level compared to national recommendations;
- Whether schools follow an age-appropriate PE curriculum;
- How schools promote 'healthy lifestyles' including school programs and policies on nutrition and physical activity as it relates to Title I recipients.
Data collection costs money and so does good programs. Perhaps research appropriation should go to data collection which will identify good practices and thus provide direction on proper spending or equipment and curriculum.
Michael Cordier
Monday, May 10, 2010
Washington DC Takes the Lead
Washington DC is not a principality but the smallest state in the nation. It could be the most important piece of real estate in the USA, serving as the capital and power bastion. Washington District of Columbia does not house many folks due to cost and size, but saw development of many housing projects during the previous century which today accommodate 71,000 school students. Sadly, it boasts one of the highest obesity rates in the country. 43% of students enrolled in the school district is overweight or obese.
Finally the 13-member DC Council proposed legislation to increase physical education and clamp down on fast foods served in the schools. There is a political angle to this change of heart: Michell Obama's initiative on healthier foods in schools is sited as inspiration.
The Washing Post reports that, "The bill would ban trans fats and limit sodium and saturated fats. City public and charter schools would have to meet the federal "gold standard" for lunches, which requires that a different fruit and vegetable be served every day and that only low-fat or non-fat milk and whole grains be offered.The estimated cost is $23 million over four years. The measure would establish mandatory guidelines on caloric intake at breakfast and lunch, effectively forcing smaller and healthier portions. In elementary schools, breakfasts would have a required range of 350 to 550 calories, and lunches would have a range of 450 to 600 calories. In high schools, the required range would be 450 to 600 calories for breakfast and 750 to 850 calories for lunch".
The bill also put much greater emphasis on physical education in city schools. Elementary students, for instance, receive an average of 45 minutes of physical education a week. The bill would increase the requirement to 150 minutes starting in 2014. In middle school, where students now have physical education for one trimester, they would attend gym class throughout the school year for at least 225 minutes a week.
This is not a lot of money given the size and impact of a very good program but is still unfunded in a struggling economy. Proposals are on the table to levy a tax on soda sales in the state - which has soda distributors and manufacturers up in arms! If approved, it is a giant leap in the right direction!
Michael Cordier
Finally the 13-member DC Council proposed legislation to increase physical education and clamp down on fast foods served in the schools. There is a political angle to this change of heart: Michell Obama's initiative on healthier foods in schools is sited as inspiration.
The Washing Post reports that, "The bill would ban trans fats and limit sodium and saturated fats. City public and charter schools would have to meet the federal "gold standard" for lunches, which requires that a different fruit and vegetable be served every day and that only low-fat or non-fat milk and whole grains be offered.The estimated cost is $23 million over four years. The measure would establish mandatory guidelines on caloric intake at breakfast and lunch, effectively forcing smaller and healthier portions. In elementary schools, breakfasts would have a required range of 350 to 550 calories, and lunches would have a range of 450 to 600 calories. In high schools, the required range would be 450 to 600 calories for breakfast and 750 to 850 calories for lunch".
The bill also put much greater emphasis on physical education in city schools. Elementary students, for instance, receive an average of 45 minutes of physical education a week. The bill would increase the requirement to 150 minutes starting in 2014. In middle school, where students now have physical education for one trimester, they would attend gym class throughout the school year for at least 225 minutes a week.
This is not a lot of money given the size and impact of a very good program but is still unfunded in a struggling economy. Proposals are on the table to levy a tax on soda sales in the state - which has soda distributors and manufacturers up in arms! If approved, it is a giant leap in the right direction!
Michael Cordier
Friday, May 7, 2010
Play, Play, Play
Here is a story that 'warms the cockles'. The Arizona Daily Start reports on a preschool program that was started in 1948, is owned and managed by parents, and became fully integrated three years before it became state law in 1954. The Tuscon Community School hosts about 80 children from ages 3 to 6. All learning takes place through PLAY. It was the mission back in 1948 and it is still the mission.
"Children should be able to try things out. Play is how you learn things," says school Director Mary Sue Houser, a proud alum of the school herself back in the late 1960s. Parents can't just simply 'drop off' their kids and drive into the sunrise every morning. It is expected that each parent puts in 12 to 18 days a year on site! "Involved" is the operative word in this unique school.
Activities are split between inside and outside, with inside learning also revolving around play. There are pianos to bang on and art projects to tackle - but NO coloring between the lines. Annual fees range from around $1,500 to $3,300, depending on age and number of days attended. Scholarships are available, and the school holds regular fundraisers.
Reporter Bonnie Henry comments that, yes, kids will still be kids. When they get too rambunctious, they're given 'good work to do'. "We give them hammer and nails and something to work on", says the principal.
Now that sounds like kids being kids.
Michael Cordier
"Children should be able to try things out. Play is how you learn things," says school Director Mary Sue Houser, a proud alum of the school herself back in the late 1960s. Parents can't just simply 'drop off' their kids and drive into the sunrise every morning. It is expected that each parent puts in 12 to 18 days a year on site! "Involved" is the operative word in this unique school.
Activities are split between inside and outside, with inside learning also revolving around play. There are pianos to bang on and art projects to tackle - but NO coloring between the lines. Annual fees range from around $1,500 to $3,300, depending on age and number of days attended. Scholarships are available, and the school holds regular fundraisers.
Reporter Bonnie Henry comments that, yes, kids will still be kids. When they get too rambunctious, they're given 'good work to do'. "We give them hammer and nails and something to work on", says the principal.
Now that sounds like kids being kids.
Michael Cordier
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)