Monday, October 25, 2010

World issues on Education

Education headlines in America report on funding issues, political shifting, integration issues, charter school dominance, and union entitlements amongst still-declining budgets. These are noble issues to discuss but pales in comparison with happenings around the world. Perspective is sometimes necessary to understand how well students and teachers have in America.

In South Africa a recent study reported that as much as 70% of SA's public schools are dysfunctional. This is an education sector in crisis. Politicians long for a general society that were united on education issues as manifested at the end of Apartheid era. The South African Democratic Teachers Union declared that South Africa was running out of time  to improve the system that impacts the lives of 12 million students attending public schools.

The Philipines is trying to meet a shortfall of 70,000 classrooms while legislation is proposed to add two more years of basic education that will require another 55,000 classrooms. Imagine not having an option of even a dilapidated building to host students.

Sweden led the charge to inspire other countries to adopt the 'free schools' model that was developed two decades ago. Ten percent of the government funded schools are run by religious groups and several have been cited for misconduct. Turns out that at least one school received money from a group that is also funding the Taliban and al-Quida. And we thought the Tea Party was radical.

In Kenia a need was raised for major changes in Kenyan schools. A standardized test used to determine whether children should progress from eight grade to high school was dropped or changed. The government's response was that reforms ' must not be rushed'. In New Zealand teachers delayed a strike to continue bargaining for better benefits. Sounds familiar? As recently as last year Hawaii teachers opted to teach four days a week rather than take a small pay cut to teach a full week - costing Hawaii students almost 40 less days of school.

Students do not have a vote, cannot dictate policy, cannot enforce best practices or build classrooms. Adults are in charge and maybe, just maybe the wise can take a page from the young ones who so desperately want to learn.
Michael Cordier

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Higher Education for Me?

It would be easy to report on a wonderful 5-acre urban garden project in Arlington, VA where inner city students get the experience to plant, care and grow vegetables in 19 plots as part of their community service work. Where one high school senior commented that she did not know that sweet potatoes grew underground until the garden project.


 
Equally noteworthy is the hard-core fitness program developed by PE teacher, Orlandus Thomas at Comer Preparatory School, a charter school in Chicago. There, music fills the air and students never stops from moving - except when they participate in a cooking class or have discussions about healthy nutrition.


 
But what caught the attention is a Canadian report this week concluding that many young students set their sights on university or college much earlier than believed - before they arrive in Grade 9! The Toronto Globe & Mail reports that  research shows that almost half of low-income students make their decision about post-secondary education before they even set foot in high school, regardless of the financial burden. 


 
As the USA and other countries try to curb drop-out rates amongst high schoolers, education agencies should be challenged to rethink their approach as attitudes about higher education is just as important as access to it. It seems that a strategy needs to be developed at elementary and middle school levels to encourage adolescents and teens to start choosing career paths with the possibility of attending college or university.


 
 In the study of 10,000 low-income secondary students it was found that for every teen influenced by parents or culture to obtain post-secondary education, others receive little input. Furthermore, it’s these late deciders who are much more likely to leave university or college without graduating.


 
Neither mom or dad attended university the household I grew up. Since I could remember there was no option for any of the kids. We were raised with the notion that we will go to university. We all did. The thought of the consequences if we did not weight far too heavy! Thank Mom. Thanks Dad.
Michael Cordier

Friday, October 1, 2010

Nutrition and Legislation

In the past we have reported that the government is not capable of telling parents what their children can or cannot eat, but can legislate what can be served in public institutions supported by tax dollars such as schools. The government can demand healthier burgers, limited or no sugary sodas, low-fat milk, wholewheat bread and so forth when they pay for it. In fact, health advocates have sought for more than ten years now to get legislation passed to such effect and made major overtures to major food and beverage companies to support this cause. Finally everyone is on the same page but there is one caveat: better food choices cost more and who is going to pay for it?

First Lady Michelle Obama has lobbied aggressively for the proposed Child Nutrition Bill as part of her "Let's Move" program. She installed a fresh vegetable garden at the White House and addressed the Senate and House on this issue. She 'made an extensive outreach' to the Speaker of the House to rally support for the Child Nutrition Bill but to no avail.

One hundred and six Democrats could not stomach the thought that money from the Food Stamps fund be taken to pay for part of the $4.5 billion cost of the Child Nutrition Bill and voted against the bill. As a result, the bill is back to the drawing board. Obviously legislators have being eyeing large pots of money for different usages.

Even if the bill is approved after the elections it is only the first step in revamping school lunches. No clear guidelines exist to determine what kinds of foods could be sold or what ingredients may be limited. The Agriculture Department will decide that. It is fair to say that we need to get ready for a real food fight!
Michael Cordier